![affinity photo luminosity plugin affinity photo luminosity plugin](https://www.webdesignerdepot.com/cdn-origin/uploads/2015/02/one.jpg)
![affinity photo luminosity plugin affinity photo luminosity plugin](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/TB8726U-Cpw/maxresdefault.jpg)
While I always preferred Aperture, I've been using Lightroom since the pre-1.0 days, and I know my way around it well enough that switching to something else now is a bigger headache than it's worth for me, assuming I could even find something that would duplicate all of the features I've gotten used to.
![affinity photo luminosity plugin affinity photo luminosity plugin](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/b1/e9/1f/b1e91fa7f5ccc68ae824be089d81db97.png)
I don't know if there's any single user that uses more than 10-20% of Photoshop's features, but there isn't a feature there that isn't used by someone.Īll that said, if Apple hadn't cancelled Aperture, I probably wouldn't still be using Photoshop, since I'm really primarily interested in Lightroom, and Photoshop just comes along in the $10/month Photography plan. You wouldn't believe the number of industries that use Photoshop for all sorts of esoteric things - I'm a member of Adobe's Photoshop pre-release program, and I'm constantly amazed at the feature requests from some of the other members, and the workflows they use. While there are applications that do some things faster than Photoshop, or in a more straightforward way, I don't think there's anything that does everything that Photoshop does. As of last time I checked that process is vastly faster in the Adobe ecosystem than with anything else. So that's how I work: sort/rename in Bridge, adjust in ACR then convert in LR. However, I do all my sorting and adjustments in Bridge/ACR because LR is painfully slow in that process. LR is also about 5x faster than Photoshop for reasons I can't explain - from what I can see LR makes better use of multiprocessing then PS. FYI that's the only reason I use LR - batch conversion. It was a huge difference as of a couple years ago. I usually then dump the raw images to TIFF and I found Lightroom to be significantly faster than competing products in that process - like 5x faster. Adobe Bridge and ACR certainly struggle with that process but I found them better than doing the same with competing products. When I process them I usually need to open them up in a raw processor (ACR) and make adjustments then apply those adjustments to thousands of images. Because I do timelapse it's not unusual for me to capture 10,000 images over a couple days. It's the file handling that is probably the biggest one for me. I can remember, however, where I found PS to be better: masking/selections and batch file handling/processing. It's been a couple years since I tried something else for photo editing and I can't remember what I've tried. That's all you need to know! Adobe has gone from a software company for creatives to a data harvester and has turned to see their customers as cash cows.Ĭlick to expand.Honestly I can't recall. When kindly asking about these server connections the company gets defensive and denies any information. Plus, Adobe constantly runs questionable server connections in the background which are not disclosed and which I see as a potential privacy offense of the biggest kind. It is perfectly suitable for most tasks.Īdobe on the other hand adds more bugs than features to Photoshop these days and their quality control has gone down the drain since they introduced the subscription model. work on huge files which require to be saved in PSB format (Affinity sadly does not support it)Īnybody else should indeed give Affinity Photo a shot.need to use certain plugins that would not run on Affinity.
![affinity photo luminosity plugin affinity photo luminosity plugin](https://photography-raw.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Affinity-Photo-plugins-cover-1024x683.jpg)